messages : 9496 Inscrit le : 23/09/2007 Localisation : le monde Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mer 17 Oct 2007 - 17:25
Rappel du premier message :
Bonjour à tous,
Le F-35 est l'avenir de beaucoup de forces aériennes, il remplacera les F-16, A-10, Harrier et autres. Je propose que soient postées ici, si vous êtres d'accord, toutes les infos au sujet du F-35. Merci de m'avoir lu.
Article (en anglais) fort intéressant sur l'avion qui comprend un pdf avec les différents armements que pourra emporter le F-35, tant en soutes, que sous les ailes. Furtif, moins furtif...
Dernière édition par le Dim 2 Déc 2007 - 16:06, édité 3 fois
Auteur
Message
Yakuza Administrateur
messages : 21656 Inscrit le : 15/09/2009 Localisation : 511 Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Sam 3 Oct 2009 - 1:01
_________________
Fremo Administrateur
messages : 24819 Inscrit le : 14/02/2009 Localisation : 7Seas Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mer 7 Oct 2009 - 23:51
Citation :
F-35 Lightning II status and future prospects
September 17, 2009 (by Bjørnar Bolsøy) - Activities at Lockheed Martin's Fort Worth facilities have steadily increased over the past year as more than a dozen F-35 jets have taken shape on the production line. But there are some signs that things are shifting into a new gear at the Texas manufacturer. F-16.net recently met with Lockheed Martin for a brief. Here is the update.
After a couple of months on the ground for modifications the BF-2 jet has been back in the air flying multiple weekly test sorties. BF-1 is also flying again after a period of modifications and a trip back to the hover pit in preparation for the upcoming STOVL transition flights. Both jets will shortly transfer to the Naval Air Station Patuxent River for this important stage in the flight testing.
The first Navy variant, the CF-1, has been delivered and will join the six jets currently on the flight line while AF-1, the first weight optimized CTOL airframe, is due for its first flight next month. BF-3 has successfully completed a series of ground tests, which included a full compliment of under wing weapon stores, "ahead of schedule and close to predictions" and is also scheduled for its first flight within weeks.
AF-2, AF-3 and BF-4, the first mission-systems aircraft, are expected to fly before years end. AA-1, the first flyable test aircraft, was ferried to Edwards Air Force Base last week. It will then head off to China Lake Naval Weapons Testing Center for live firing exercises to test the aircraft's survivability. The jet is not expected to be fly worthy after this. The F-35 is also on track to deliver its 5th generation stealth promise. Recent test results on the Highly Accurate Low Observable (HALO) full scale model show that signatures closely match the expected levels.
While returning to flight has been important, Lockheed Martin is in no hurry to rush the test flights prematurely. "The flights will ramp up in the coming months, but this year our main focus is to get all the SDD planes delivered on schedule and then 2010 and 2011 will be when the flights really get going", F-35 Program Executive Vice President Tom Burbage explains. "We would have liked to see that happen a little bit sooner", Burbage adds, "but we have a good margin in place for dealing with flight test issues without affecting the overall schedule". "We are confident that we will meet the IOC dates".
Compared to some legacy programs the F-35 is in a favorable position. "We have completed the structural static tests in a mere 350 days". "And without a major problem", Burbage adds. In comparison, the F-22 took about 1000 days, or almost three years, which is more typical for legacy programs. Because of this the F-35 can open up the flight envelope sooner than the jets before it. "We don't have to wait for the structural testing and then slowly expand the envelope", says Burbage. In addition, all the flyable production representative aircraft - the so called SDD vehicles - can fully explore the flight envelope, giving the flight test program more flexibility in the flying schedule.
From a design point of view Lockheed Martin has taken numerous preemptive steps based on the experience gained from previous programs. For instance the F-35s twin vertical tails are designed to deal effectively with the excessive vibrations which occurs from strong air vortices generated at high G's and angles of attack. These vortices have a very good -- and quite deliberate – function; to increase lift and reduce drag which greatly assists maneuverability. The F-35 lacks the distinctive leading edge extensions (LEX) found on the F-16 and F-18 jets. On the F-35 this important function is provided by the carefully shaped engine cowls and -- to a lesser degree -- the chinned forward fuselage, and is a good example of how aerodynamic design tools have come a very long way since the days of the venerable YF-16. These vortices are usually not a problem for single tail designs, like the F-16, as they split on either side of the tail, but twin tails puts them right in the airflow's path causing vibration. "This can severely reduce the tail's structural life span, as seen in some legacy programs", Burbage explains. "We have prepared for that".
Another example of preemptive measures is found on the folding wing section on the F-35C carrier model. Jets flying in the transonic regime are prone to a phenomenon called "accelerated stall". One way this can occur is in a steep, high G turn where asymmetric shock formation can cause one wing to loose lift -- or stalling -- forcing the plane into a roll, and possibly a spin. Wing drop problems has plagued some earlier fighter programs and due to the inherently unpredictable nature of transonic airflows modern computer tools and wind tunnel procedures are still not refined enough to accurately predict airflows in these cases. As a practical solution Lockheed Martin designers have mounted an aerodynamic spoiler towards the leading edge of the folding wing. In case of a wing drop the spoiler pops up interfering with the airflow and restoring control. This is simply a precautionary step; if the problem does not show up during flight testing, the spoilers will be removed on the production planes. A simple procedure when compared to the extensive task of having to redesign the wing. This kind of "lessons learned" from earlier programs is an essential condition for the F-35 program. "We have tried to think of every possible problem that might occur and taken steps to prevent them", Burbage explains.
With regards to aircraft capabilities, Lockheed Martin confirms that the Infrared Search and Track (IRST) capability is slated for Block 3, the first fully mission capable F-35. "It's a fully functional capability", says Lockheed Martins's Vice President for Business Development Steve O'Bryan. "It includes sensor fused input from both the Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System and Electo-Optical Targeting System sensors", often just called the EODAS and EOTS units. Block 3 will focus on air-to-air capability while Block 5 will expand with air-to-surface modes.
However, already in Block 2 the EOTS unit will have a baseline capability that goes beyond current 4th generation systems. This includes air-to-surface targeting, ability to track multiple targets, laser designation, magnified Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) imagery and much more. Combined with the Helmet Mounted Display and High Off-Bore sight weapons it will enable the F-35 to engage multiple aerial and surface targets simultaneously in a 360 degree sector around the aircraft. It's a unique capability in the fighter world today -- and the foreseeable future.
Looking towards future block upgrades there are several interesting items on the horizon. The AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare (EW) suite is a major part of the F-35s "protective bubble" and Lockheed Martin is already looking ahead. Fuselage space is allocated for avionics growth and the embedded EW antenna compartments located in the wing sections have room for future expansions. It depends on customer demands. Alternatively the F-35s missionized gun pod could be used to expand the F-35s electronic capabilities. "The gun pod is already there, and it's stealthy, so we see a potential for different types of equipment", says O'Bryan. That could include EW equipment, a reconnaissance pod or even side and aft-looking AESA radar, adding to the F-35's range of powerful capabilities.
It's an interesting prospect. Recall that the F-22 has allocated growth space for AESA modules in the forward fuselage side cheeks. Across the Atlantic, the Swedes and Europeans are considering a less novel, but still useful, "swash plate" antenna approach for the JAS Gripen and Eurofighter jets. This allows the AESA antenna to rotate and cover a wider field. The F-35's AESA antenna is fixed at an inclined angle giving it a reasonable side coverage, but still falls short of a dedicated side-looking capability. Putting a radar in the gun pod would extend the capabilities well beyond currently planned systems. The extra wide coverage would come in handy. Not just for common radar modes like search and track, but also such tasks as mid-course missile guidance at greater angles giving a pilot more freedom to maneuver after missile launch. A swash plate approach was considered early on in the JSF program, but Lockheed Martin found that it would seriously impact stealth performance. "An antenna pointing in all directions is a big source of reflections in the forward aspect, so we needed to avoid that", O'Bryan explains.
The F-35 will link up with other stealthy aircraft, such as the B-2 and F-22, through its stealthy Multi-functional Advanced Data Link (MADL). In addition the F-35 supports a number of formats, such as Link-16, for communication with other combat assets. Link-16 usage would in some cases be restricted in order to maintain the aircraft's stealth cover. This is not a big problem for such tasks as missile updates as an undetected F-35 would be well inside the opponent's "kill chain". It would essentially deny the opponent's situational awareness, thus his ability to respond, requiring fewer, if any, missile updates on its way to the target. Lockheed Martin won't confirm plans for a stealthy weapons link in the future, but such a capability seems likely based on the anticipated threat scenario in the post 2020 time frame.
Another reason for Lockheed Martin's fixed AESA antenna approach is the reduced weight and complexity compared to a mechanical gimballed system. This translates into less maintenance and cost. Due to its exceptional reliability the AESA antenna is, in fact, expected to outlast the aircraft's 30 year or 8000 hour service life. Furtheremore; the nose cone is sealed to optimize the F-35's stealth signature. The sealing can be removed and reapplied with "relative ease" if needed, but this will only be done in rare cases, such as major upgrades.
Also planned is a Directional Infrared Countermeasures (DIRCM) capability. This is for a notional Block 5 upgrade with fielding possibly in the 2017-2018 time frame. The system would provide active protection against inbound missiles detected by the F-35s infrared sensors. "The exact type of system is not yet decided", O'Bryan explains, "but proposed solutions include a laser". A laser beam would target an inbound missile's seeker head, breaking its target lock or even destroying it. Lockheed Martin envisions two small laser turrets; one underneath and one atop the F-35s fuselage, giving full spherical coverage. "A laser is a natural choice because the technology is ready and relatively cheap to implement", O'Bryan says. Stealth would not be compromised. Such a laser would have other uses as well. "The laser could be pointed in any direction, taking ranging measurements or painting targets for other combat units". This would increase the F-35's flexibility on the battlefield.
Lockheed Martin's interest in lasers goes even further. Under study as potential growth capabilities are high speed laser communications and LIDAR (Laser Detection and Ranging). The latter could be used for 3D mapping of the ground or airborne targets while laser comm could beam the large amounts of data quickly to other tactical assets. This could involve the EOTS sensor underneath the nose of the aircraft which already implements a laser range finder and a laser spot tracker.
Research on a high power solid-state laser is continuing outside the SDD program. This would employ a laser of at least 100 KW effect capable of damaging or destroying tactical assets at useful distances. That work is being done by Lockheed Martin's Advanced Development programs, generally known as Skunk Works, and involves several other companies. The laser would be powered by a generator located in the lift-fan bay on the F-35B STOVL variant and driven by the engine. Testing would likely begin sometime in the middle of the next decade.
Weapons integration is an important aspect of the SDD phase. Several of the European JSF partner nations have acquired or are planning acquisition of the MBDA Meteor and IRIS-T missiles which may be considered for integration in follow-on development. Lockheed Martin informs that digital fit checks have been made to assess initial physical fit. Related to this, Norway funded a preliminary study in 2003 on the integration of IRIS-T and is actively consulting with Lockheed Martin in the development of the Joint Strike Missile through Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KDA). The missiles would be carried internally in the weapon bays or the under wing stations. Norway has yet to make a decision on which missiles to acquire for the F-35.
Development of a stealthy air-to-air pylon has been brought up from time to time. This would allow for reduced signatures when carrying missiles on the wing stations. But the project appears to have been put on ice for the time being. O'Bryan informs that the project is currently not funded. What is being studied, however, is a 6 air-to-air missile capability in the internal weapons bays, which would substantially increase the F-35's stealthy fire power.
Interestingly, sketches of the F-35 early in the program depicted weapon stations 1 and 11 located on wingtip rails, but this was later changed. As the design matured the wing chord at the tips was reduced enough to make rails impractical, so they were moved inboard to their current location on the outer wing section.
Also mentioned in the F-35 block road map are "range and propulsion improvements". Increased thrust is one possibility. Lockheed Martin informs that the engine inlets are designed with a considerable margin for growth anticipating higher air flow requirements in the future.
The F-35's future looks impressive. Having prospects for up to 6000 aircraft spanning almost three decades of production, its modernization potential lacks any equal in the aviation world. With the U.S. remaining a tier one operator it is destined to provide a steady stream of state of the art technology and know-how for any allied air force choosing to invest in this 5th generation fighter.
(BF-3 during Ground Vibration Testing with a full load of external weapons, including the 25mm Missionized Gun Pod.)
Source :: F-16.net
_________________
Seguleh I Lt-colonel
messages : 1281 Inscrit le : 22/07/2008 Localisation : tatooine Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Jeu 8 Oct 2009 - 1:00
Quelqu'un sait si les lanceurs sont "travaillés" au niveau furtivité, ils ont l'air surdimensionnés.
Viper Modérateur
messages : 7967 Inscrit le : 24/04/2007 Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Jeu 8 Oct 2009 - 1:22
Je pense qu'ils doivent intégrer le même revétement que le fuselage et leur profile "étrange" est à mon avis pas dû au hazard ...dans un soucie de furtivité certainement ... Pour la taille je pense qu'il faut chercher du côté des différents systèmes d'armes ce qui expliquerais le dimentionnement
_________________
Dernière édition par Viper le Jeu 8 Oct 2009 - 3:50, édité 1 fois
Seguleh I Lt-colonel
messages : 1281 Inscrit le : 22/07/2008 Localisation : tatooine Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Jeu 8 Oct 2009 - 1:25
Merci Viper Je jetterais un coup d'oeil demain voir si je trouve quelque chose dessus.
Seguleh I Lt-colonel
messages : 1281 Inscrit le : 22/07/2008 Localisation : tatooine Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Ven 9 Oct 2009 - 2:17
Jai trouvé ca sur un article jane's
Citation :
It has always been a credo of the JSF programme that external weapons carriage fundamentally compromises the aircraft's very low observable (VLO) design. Speaking at the Singapore Airshow, George Stanridge, Lockheed Martin's vice president of F-35 Business Development, noted that, in general, "if you see something hanging on the aircraft it means you are not a VLO airplane". A new 'stealthy' pylon has been developed for the external ASRAAM and MBDA notes that the finless missile already has a tiny radar cross-section.
Viper Modérateur
messages : 7967 Inscrit le : 24/04/2007 Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Ven 9 Oct 2009 - 3:01
Bien joué Seguleh !
_________________
Seguleh I Lt-colonel
messages : 1281 Inscrit le : 22/07/2008 Localisation : tatooine Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Ven 9 Oct 2009 - 3:15
Un plaisir Viper
reese Colonel
messages : 1646 Inscrit le : 10/05/2009 Localisation : alger Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Ven 9 Oct 2009 - 21:11
la version ultime du HMD du F 35 , tres instructif :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 12 Oct 2009 - 14:54
décollage vertical d'un F-35
Invité Invité
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 12 Oct 2009 - 19:31
tout simplement magnifique
Mr.Jad Colonel
messages : 1535 Inscrit le : 07/03/2009 Localisation : FL370 Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Dim 18 Oct 2009 - 0:10
_________________ “Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return.” ― Leonardo da Vinci
Fremo Administrateur
messages : 24819 Inscrit le : 14/02/2009 Localisation : 7Seas Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Jeu 22 Oct 2009 - 13:01
des nouvelles à propos des F-35
Citation :
USAF: Advent upgrade 'feasible' for F-35 engine A top US Air Force technologist confirms the potential exists after 2013 to greatly improve the fuel efficiency of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter engine by inserting a third bypass airstream. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) studies have affirmed the upgrade is technically feasible, albeit complex and expensive, says Larry Burns, programme manager for the versatile affordable advanced turbine engines programme. By engaging the third bypass airstream during cruise, the engine can adapt the ratio of the airflow bypassing the core in flight. A higher bypass ratio reduces speed, but increases fuel efficiency dramatically during cruise flight. AFRL is developing the potential upgrade under the adaptive versatile engine technology (Advent). The AFRL last week selected Rolls-Royce to build and test a full-scale engine demonstrator on the ground in early 2013. General Electric, meanwhile, will develop a separate Advent core, but budget cuts prevented a second, full-scale ground test programme. Advent technology has often been linked to the cancelled Next Generation Bomber programme. Burns, however, calls that a misconception. Instead, Advent is developing a suite of technologies that can support any of several potential next-generation programmes, including for fighters, bombers, airlifters and spyplanes, Burns says. It is unlikely that a new centreline engine could be inserted into a current aircraft, such as an F-35, Burns says. But key Advent components, such as the third bypass airstream, would be available for retrofit on current engines, he adds. Retrofit engine programmes are "few and far between", Burns says, but the potential fuel savings over the 20-year life of the aircraft could justify the investment. The AFRL has explored such opportunities by commissioning "vision studies" by the major airframers - Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. The potential advantages of Advent technology have been raised in the debate over the future of the General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 alternate engine. The GE/R-R team has argued that one of the reasons to preserve funding for the embattled F136 is Advent, since rival Pratt & Whitney has been excluded from the programme. P&W officials have responded that the Advent technology could be applied to any engine, including the baseline F135 engine for the F-35. Burns also adds that Lockheed's vision studies have commissioned P&W to continue designing Advent upgrades. The AFRL launched the Advent programme to achieve a step-change in the fuel-efficiency performance of turbofan technology, which had seemingly reached an innovative plateau more than four decades after it was introduced with the GE TF33.
Source :: FlightGlobal
Citation :
Lockheed Dangles F-35 Work For S. Korea South Korean companies could bid for work on the Lockheed Martin F-35 if the country orders the stealth fighter, even though suppliers for the airframe were chosen years ago, the U.S. manufacturer says. As production builds up turning out one fighter a day, second-source suppliers will be needed for parts that Lockheed Martin itself is responsible for supplying, says Steve O’Bryan, vice president for F-35 business development. Building F-35 parts to Lockheed Martin’s blueprints would give Korea Aerospace Industries manufacturing work but no opportunity to advance its fighter-design skills, which it might get from participation in Boeing’s proposed program to develop the F-15SE, an Eagle with less radar reflectivity. Korean Air Aerospace, the manufacturing division of airline Korean Air, would presumably also be interested in helping to make the F-35. Software work will be available for block 2 and 3 F-35s, says O’Bryan says. Those two upgrades to the aircraft will be based on software improvements, not physical changes. South Korea is looking for 60 fighters to fill its F-X Phase III requirement. Separately, the indigenous KF-X fighter is proposed for a more distant requirement for fighters that would be fielded in the 2020s. That program, whose future is expected to be decided next month, would greatly advance Korea Aerospace’s skills, but it is being criticized as poor value for money compared to the F-35. Moreover, the KF-X specification has been downgraded to only semi-stealthy performance.
Source :: Aviationweek
_________________
Invité Invité
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Dim 25 Oct 2009 - 14:31
Synthetic aperture Radar
EOTS (Electro-Optical Targeting System)
DAS (Distributed Aperture system)
Dernière édition par Raptor le Mar 26 Jan 2010 - 21:43, édité 1 fois
Invité Invité
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 2 Nov 2009 - 0:38
un schema qui explique les etapes de la construction d`un f-35
Spoiler:
MAATAWI Modérateur
messages : 14757 Inscrit le : 07/09/2009 Localisation : Maroc Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 2 Nov 2009 - 16:29
Début de l'assemblage du premier F-35 Déstiné au Royaume-Uni
Northrop Grumman a annoncé le 30 -10 2009 avoir débuté le montage du fuselage central du premier Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter pour le marché international L'appareil, un F35B STOVL(décollage court et atterissage vertical) est destiné pour le Royaume-Uni sous l'appellartion BK-1
_________________ Le Prophéte (saw) a dit: Les Hommes Les meilleurs sont ceux qui sont les plus utiles aux autres
Samyadams Administrateur
messages : 7134 Inscrit le : 14/08/2008 Localisation : Rabat Maroc Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 2 Nov 2009 - 20:21
Il va coûter maintenant beaucoup plus cher que les commandes US ont été réduites de moitié Je ne sais pas quelle solution sera adoptée en matière de prix avec les pays qui ont déjà passé commande ? Le prix qui leur a été fixé se basait sur une commande locale beaucoup plus importante
Invité Invité
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mar 3 Nov 2009 - 1:11
Samyadams a écrit:
...Je ne sais pas quelle solution sera adoptée en matière de prix avec les pays qui ont déjà passé commande ? Le prix qui leur a été fixé se basait sur une commande locale beaucoup plus importante
Est ce qu'ils ont le choix?! non! les pays du JSF sont prix en otages.
reese Colonel
messages : 1646 Inscrit le : 10/05/2009 Localisation : alger Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mar 3 Nov 2009 - 10:53
Samyadams a écrit:
Il va coûter maintenant beaucoup plus cher que les commandes US ont été réduites de moitié Je ne sais pas quelle solution sera adoptée en matière de prix avec les pays qui ont déjà passé commande ? Le prix qui leur a été fixé se basait sur une commande locale beaucoup plus importante
logiquement tout le monde reduira la voilure devant cet enorme suppositoire de plus en plus difficlie a avaler pour tout les naifs "alliés" qui ont signer un cheque en blanc a LM et au Pentagone
Citation :
F-35 total may be cut by half, report says
Manufacturer disputes findings
Rising costs, changing threats and rival aircraft — manned and unmanned — could cut nearly in half the number of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters that ultimately are built, a Dutch defense analyst said in a report to the Dutch parliament. And if fewer planes are built, the price for each, already $100 million or more, will undoubtedly increase, analyst Johan Boeder warned. A “likely estimate” is that 2,500 F-35s eventually will be built, Boeder wrote in a report delivered to Dutch lawmakers in September. The Netherlands, one of nine countries financing the development of the F-35, was expected to buy 85 planes, but may cut that to 57, Boeder said. If his overall forecast is correct, the number of F-35s built would be far fewer than the 4,500 or more that F-35-maker Lockheed Martin said it expects to sell. The U.S. military has even predicted that the market for F-35s could reach 6,000. Lockheed dismisses Boeder’s forecast, saying that the company anticipates no drop in demand for F-35s. “F-35 quantities have held steady for most of the decade,” Lockheed spokesman Chris Geisel said. “Year after year, the program has received strong political and budgetary support.” Geisel said that “if F-35 numbers change, it is more likely that they will increase” than decrease. That’s because hundreds of current fighters are approaching retirement age, and nations beyond the nine countries that are F-35 partners are expressing interest in buying the aircraft, he said. But U.S. defense analyst Barry Watts agreed that, ultimately, it is likely that only half of the planned F-35s will be built. Watts, of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, said history is against the F-35. In the four stealthy aircraft programs that preceded the F-35, the U.S. military declared a need for 2,378 planes, but ultimately bought only 267. Those programs were the F-117, A-12, B-2 and F-22. Current plans call for the U.S. military to buy 2,443 F-35s, “but if history is any guide, I would not hold my breath waiting” for that many purchases to be completed. “I think the number is going to be about half of that,” said Watts, who is a retired Air Force combat pilot and former chief of the Pentagon’s Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation. Watts said he expects the Air Force to buy 800 to 1,000 F-35s instead of the 1,763 in current service plans. The Air Force can get by with fewer F-35s because it has decided to keep its A-10s and F-15Es in service. And the Navy is likely to reconsider its F-35 buys because the plane does not have adequate range to permit U.S. aircraft carriers to operate outside the range of area denial weapons being developed by China and other nations, Watts said. Unmanned carrier-based aircraft are expected to offer the Navy much greater range, he said. Geisel, Lockheed’s spokesman, said that the U.S. still intends to buy 2,443 F-35s, Britain plans to buy 138 and the seven other nations participating in the F-35 program plan to buy about 700. “There are no indications from any of the partner countries that they are going to trim back,” he said. In addition to those 3,281, Lockheed expects to sell F-35s to Israel, Japan, South Korea and other customers. The total “could reach 4,500 or more,” Geisel said. But Boeder, the Dutch analyst, said the U.S. commitment to the F-35 is already eroding. Originally, the U.S. planned to buy 2,978 F-35s, but by 2005 had cut that number by more than 500. Since then, even lower numbers have been suggested. In 2007, Boeder said, the U.S. pushed acquisition of 515 F-35s far into the future — to between 2028 and 2035 — to ease funding problems. But Boeder said that move raises questions about whether the planes will ever be bought.
messages : 7134 Inscrit le : 14/08/2008 Localisation : Rabat Maroc Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mar 3 Nov 2009 - 16:10
Et moins il y aura de commandes, plus le prix unitaire va augmenter C'est le cercle vicieux Un article d'un blog de stratégie qui n'a jamais caché son opposition au programme JSF. Il semblerait que les choses ne font qu'empirer pour le F-35
Citation :
La réalité contre le JSF, ostinato
27 octobre 2009 — Le programme JSF est entré dans une période délicate, dont les fondations ont été mises en place cet été. Des facteurs intérieurs et extérieurs se combinent pour rendre cette phase délicate. • Le point principal intérieur, nous l’avons vu ce 24 octobre 2009, concerne la prochaine livraison du rapport JET à la direction civile du Pentagone. Il s’agit de l’annonce des probables résultats de l’enquête du Joint Team Assessment (JET), institué par la direction politique du Pentagone comme la référence technique pour évaluer l’état du programme JSF. Il semble que ces résultats confirment, sinon aggravent le rapport précédent (2008) qui faisait état de fortes augmentations de coûts et de délais. D’une façon générale, Lockheed Martin (LM) a présenté l’argument qu’il ne s’agit pas d’une surprise puisque le rapport JET ne prend pas en compte ses “nouvelles méthodes” de travail. (A la fin août 2009, les partisans de LM faisaient savoir que le rapport 2008 du JET avait pris en compte des références dépassées et que l’équipe JET rétablirait la vérité en se rendant à l’évidence de la “réalité-LM” dans son nouveau rapport. Ce n’est pas le cas.) Dans tous les cas, LM a réagi à la publication dans InsideDéfense.com des premiers échos sur le rapport JET par un communiqué avec l’habituelle argumentation: nous avons de nouvelles méthodes de travail que JET ne connaît pas, il est trop tôt pour conclure, etc. «Lockheed Martin and our industry partners recognize the Joint Estimate Team's earnest efforts to predict F-35 program costs and schedules as part of the annual DoD budget planning process. However, we disagree with their conclusions, which we believe are driven by legacy-based assumptions regarding the time required to deliver the remaining SDD aircraft, complete development, and conduct the flight test campaign. «The program is early in the flight test phase, so it is much too soon conclude that the expected payoffs will not be realized. Lockheed Martin acknowledges that modest risks to our cost and schedule baselines exist, but we envision no scenario that would justify a substantial delay to completion of development or transition to production milestones.» Le nouveau rapport JET introduit un facteur explosif dans l’évolution du programme JSF. Il faut voir maintenant ce que va en faire la direction civile du Pentagone, tandis que le Congrès, lui, attend désormais de pied ferme les explications et évaluations de ce même Pentagone sur le programme JSF. On peut observer que la direction politique du Pentagone se trouverait dans une position délicate si le rapport JET est confirmé, dans la mesure où elle a considéré que ce rapport devrait être une référence capitale de son évaluation de la situation du programme. Le point concret principal est de type légal: si le JSF tombe dans les limites de la loi Nunn-McCurdy, il doit être abandonné ou restructuré. Le premier terme de l’alternative étant officiellement et furieusement considéré comme une “non-option” du type dément, il faudrait envisager une restructuration qui se paierait au moins en temps perdu et en coûts supplémentaires, et constituerait un affreux et potentiellement mortel handicap pour le programme – qui n’en a pas besoin. Sur ce front, la situation est donc en suspens. • C’est sur le front extérieur qu’il y a du nouveau, avec un article du Times, dimanche 25 octobre 2009. Le quotidien britannique annonce que la Royal Navy a accepté une restriction majeure pour sa planification: l’abandon de son second porte-avions, dans tous les cas dans la forme prévue, éventuellement remplacée par un porte-hélicoptères en 2018. Ce choix est accompagné de la réduction de la commande de JSF afférente initialement aux deux porte-avions, de 136 à 50. Le point le plus important pour notre propos est que la décisions est attribuée par le Times au coût en augmentation constante du JSF, chiffré dans cet article à £90 millions jusqu’à au-delà de £100 millions l'exemplaire (autour de $150 millions et au-delà). «The Royal Navy has agreed to sacrifice one of its two new aircraft carriers to save about £8.2 billion from the defence budget. The admirals, who have battled for a decade to secure the two new 65,000-ton carriers, have been forced to back down because of the soaring cost of the American-produced Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft due to fly off them. […] »It is too late for the navy to renege on contracts to build the two carriers, the Queen Elizabeth, due to go into service in 2016, and the Prince of Wales, due to follow in 2018. Although the second carrier will be built, it will be used as an amphibious commando ship, with only helicopters on board instead of JSF aircraft. […] The decision to have only one new aircraft carrier will cut the number of JSFs to be flown by RAF squadrons from 138 to about 50, saving £7.6 billion. At current prices, the aircraft will cost close to £90m each, but this could rise to more than £100m.» • Ce développement vient évidemment comme une confirmation d’un rapport hollandais de l’analyste Johan Boeder sur les perspectives de vente du programme, qui réduit ces perspectives à la moitié du chiffre avancé par Lockheed Martin. (Ce rapport est présenté par ailleurs dans notre Bloc Notes de ce 27 octobre 2009.)
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-la_realite_contre_le_jsf_ostinato_27_10_2009.html Ce blog contient pas mal d'articles sur le programme JSF, plus critiques les uns que les autres
MAATAWI Modérateur
messages : 14757 Inscrit le : 07/09/2009 Localisation : Maroc Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mar 3 Nov 2009 - 17:38
Citation :
UPDATE 1-GE, Rolls de redessiner une partie du Moteur de la F-35 Lun. 2 novembre 2009 12h29 HNE
WASHINGTON, 2 novembre (Reuters) - General Electric Co (GE.N) Et Rolls-Royce Group PLC (RR.L) Ont annoncé lundi qu'ils vont redessiner une petite partie du moteur du F-35 , ils sont en développement, après avoir constaté qu'un écrou se détachait pendant le test.
Rick Kennedy, un porte-parole de GE, a déclaré à Reuters que les entreprises devraient avoir retravaillé le moteur F136 "opérationnel avant la fin de l'année." Il a dit le remaniement implique un diffuseur qui dirige l'air dans la chambre de combustion pour le moteur, et la chambre de combustion a été le rendement attendu. Président Barack Obama signé la semaine dernière de l'exercice 2010 le droit autorisation de la défense, qui autorise le financement pour le deuxième moteur d'entraînement en dépit de l'administration à faire disparaître dans l'année fiscale en cours. Mais le financement pour le programme pourrait encore être réduite par la Chambre et du Sénat qui s'approprient qui envisagent de conclure leurs travaux sur le projet de loi de défense de l'exercice 2010 les crédits de ce mois, ce qui signifie aucun problème avec les deux F-35 moteurs sont surveillés de près. Porte-parole du ministère de la Défense Geoff Morrell a déclaré la semaine dernière, le Pentagone est resté malheureux au sujet des efforts du Congrès pour continuer à financer le moteur de rechange. Bailleurs de fonds du programme moteur de rechange-dire la concurrence fera baisser les coûts du moteur sur le long terme et de réduire le risque d'une flotte à la terre entier en raison de tout le potentiel ou un défaut de conception mécanique. Pratt & Whitney, une division de United Technologies Corp (UTX.N), Construit le premier moteur de la F-35 fighter jet développé par Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N). Son moteur a également rencontré des problèmes durant les essais, ce qui nécessite quelques changements. Loren Thompson, analyste de la défense, dans un blog sur le site de son Institut Lexington, a déclaré lundi que le moteur GE-Rolls avait «rencontrez des problèmes» et «échecs répétés», encourir quatre échecs au cours de seulement 52 heures d'essais après neuf mois de développement. Au même stade, le moteur de Pratt & Whitney avait subi 700 heures de conception du système et le développement (DDD) à l'essai sans défaillance, M. Thompson. Kennedy GE a confirmé qu'il y avait eu quatre questions au cours de 52 heures de test, mais a déclaré le GE-Rolls équipe avait fait des essais moteur pendant deux ans et totalisait 800 heures sur le matériel réel avant la phase actuelle SDD a commencé. "Thompson compare des pommes avec des oranges sur le nombre d'heures de test SDD, dit-il, notant que les phases de conception du système des deux équipes et le développement étaient« différents en raison des différents niveaux de financement. " Kennedy a déclaré le moteur de Pratt a également continué à rencontrer des problèmes après 10.000 heures de tests. "Je soulève cette question de ne pas contester Pratt & Whitney capacité, mais de souligner la difficulté de l'élaboration de ces moteurs est vraiment, dit-il. A suivre ...
_________________ Le Prophéte (saw) a dit: Les Hommes Les meilleurs sont ceux qui sont les plus utiles aux autres
Fremo Administrateur
messages : 24819 Inscrit le : 14/02/2009 Localisation : 7Seas Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Dim 15 Nov 2009 - 11:28
Another F-35 flies - finally
Citation :
November 14, 2009 At 1:34 p.m. Saturday Lockheed Martin test pilot Doc Nelson pulled back on the throttle and the fourth F-35 flight test aircraft leaped from the runway on its maiden flight. It was the first flight for test aircraft AF-1, the first re-designed A-model conventional takeoff aircraft like those destined for the U.S. Air Force and most allied nations that are expected to buy F-35s. The flight was originally scheduled for one hour, but with no trouble signs and plenty of gas on board Nelson went ahead and checked off several more test points before landing at about 3:10 p.m. Lockheed's F-35 program managers, Dan Crowley and Tom Burbage, co-executive vice president/general managers overseeing the program, observed the flight from the company's control tower and shook hands with the staff when Nelson landed the aircraft softly as the two F-16 chase planes flew overhead. Crowley said the flight went very smooth with only a couple of minor caution indicators. AF-1 is only the fourth test plane to fly in three years as Lockheed has struggled to get planes built and into the test program. Officials said they hope to fly the plane at least a couple of more times next week and several times before it is flown to Edwards Air Force Base. Meanwhile, STOVL flight test plane BF-1 spent another day in Marietta, Ga. waiting for improved weather to continue its ferry flight to the Patuxent River Naval Air Station flight test center to begin vertical flight testing.
Startelegram
_________________
Invité Invité
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Lun 16 Nov 2009 - 22:01
Citation :
The lift fan provides almost half of the downward thrust needed for a pure hover mode. The fan"s two sets of counter-rotating blades are driven by a driveshaft connected to the face of the main engine fan. A clutch at the forward end of the driveshaft engages the lift fan.
Citation :
The lift fan is covered from above by an aft-hinged door, which opens as the aircraft transitions to hover mode. Thrust is controlled by the speed of the lift fan, a set of variable inlet guide vanes that reside above the rotating blades of the lift fan, and by a device called a variable area vane box nozzle on the lower side of the fan. The vane box nozzle (middle photo) contains a set of six vanes (or louvers) that direct and control the amount of downward thrust emanating from the lift fan.
Citation :
Two roll posts together contribute about ten percent of the downward thrust. More importantly, they are used to control aircraft attitude in the roll axis. The posts are at the exit end of a duct that taps into the fan section of the main engine. Thrust for the posts comes from cooler air that normally bypasses the engine"s turbine section. The exhaust areas of the two roll posts can be varied independently. The posts, therefore, control roll by expelling different amounts of thrust between the port and starboard sides of the aircraft.
Fremo Administrateur
messages : 24819 Inscrit le : 14/02/2009 Localisation : 7Seas Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Dim 22 Nov 2009 - 10:43
Citation :
U.S. May Add Money to Program for F-35 Jet The Pentagon is considering adding more than $200 million to the Joint Strike Fighter program and providing more planes for flight tests to try to reduce the possibility of large cost overruns over the next several years, military and industry officials said on Friday.
Top Pentagon acquisition officials plan to discuss options this weekend at a meeting with executives from Lockheed Martin, the prime contractor on the $300 billion program, the military’s largest. The meeting was prompted by an internal Pentagon report suggesting that work on the new stealth fighter, known as the F-35, had fallen so far behind schedule that it could cost up to $16.6 billion more than expected over the next five years. Lockheed Martin has disputed that assessment, and Pentagon officials have described it as a worst case that they are determined to prevent. The biggest cost increases would come if Lockheed Martin failed to complete the flight test program by 2013.So besides adding the money in the fiscal 2011 budget, which is now being prepared, the officials said they might buy another test plane and let Lockheed use some of the earliest operational models to help finish the testing. The Pentagon plans to buy more than 2,400 F-35s over the next 25 years, and the Air Force, the Navy and the Marine Corps will have their own versions of the single-engine fighter. Eight allied nations are also investing in the project and could buy hundreds of planes. President Obama and the defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, praised the F-35 as the new mainstay fighter when they persuaded Congress to halt production of the more sophisticated F-22 last summer. And Mr. Gates recently said he thought “most of the high-risk elements associated with this development program are largely behind us.” But Pentagon and Congressional auditors have criticized the program in recent years for problems with suppliers, delays in producing the first planes and a flight test program that remains only 2 percent complete. The latest concerns came from a special Pentagon assessment team, which includes experts on airplane production who work for an office that estimates the cost of all major Pentagon programs. The team projected that the jet program would have a $230 million shortfall in fiscal 2011. It also warned that continuing delays in the testing could escalate into much bigger overruns by forcing Lockheed Martin to retain a larger engineering staff and fix problems on planes it had already built. Company officials said that if the Pentagon bought another test plane, it would be the Navy version meant to fly from aircraft carriers, and it would be ready for the latter stages of the flight testing. Daniel J. Crowley, one of Lockheed Martin’s co-managers for the project, said in an interview on Friday that the company had been building planes faster in recent months. He said he believed that the company’s extensive use of computerized simulations to test various systems could also save time and help it get back on schedule by 2011. Thomas P. Christie, a former top Pentagon testing official, said contractors had made similar assertions about the benefits of computer simulations in building earlier planes, only to find that unexpected problems cropped up in the flight tests. He said he thought the assessment team would turn out to be correct in its estimates of the potential cost overruns. But Geoff Morrell, Mr. Gates’s press secretary, said the Pentagon was also concerned about adding too much to the program’s budget, because that could take the pressure off Lockheed Martin to manage the program better.
The New York Times
_________________
Fremo Administrateur
messages : 24819 Inscrit le : 14/02/2009 Localisation : 7Seas Nationalité : Médailles de mérite :
Sujet: Re: JSF F-35 Lightning II Mar 24 Nov 2009 - 19:49
Citation :
BAE Systems Welcomes F35 to Paxtuxent River as Vertical Flight Moves a Step Closer
(Source: BAE Systems; issued November 23, 2009)
A BAE Systems led test team has welcomed the short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the F-35 Lightning II (also known as the Joint Strike Fighter) to Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, for flight testing.
The first F-35B aircraft, designated BF-1, arrived at Patuxent River on 15 November. The Integrated Test Force team at the station will now begin a carefully planned programme of flights that will see the aircraft begin steeper and slower descents before achieving the first true vertical landing by the F-35.
Mick Ord, BAE Systems F-35 Managing Director said: “BAE Systems brings key capabilities to the F-35 programme. These include a unique heritage in short takeoff/vertical landing aircraft gained through the design and development of the Harrier aircraft in the 1960s and early 1970s, which makes us ideally placed to lead these trials. Derivatives of the original Harrier are now flown by the U.K., India, Spain, Italy and the US Marine Corps. The Joint Strike Fighter continues to build on the short takeoff/vertical landing experience, and it’s great to be able to apply our expertise on this tremendous aircraft.”
The move to Patuxent River follows a series of successful hover pit trials conducted at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth plant, which demonstrated the STOVL capability of the aircraft. During these trials, BF-1 was anchored on top of a BAE Systems-designed metal grid about 15 feet off the floor of the pit enabling the aircraft to simulate free-air flight.
These tests measured the output of the aircraft’s STOVL propulsion system and demonstrated that the F-35B exceeded the vertical thrust required to carry out its missions. The tests conducted also validated the performance of aircraft software, controls, thermal management, STOVL-system hardware and many other systems.
A key enabler to the move to Patuxent River has been the completion of aerial refueling tests that have cleared the F-35B for extended-range flights. These flights, conducted by the second STOVL variant aircraft, BF-2, demonstrated the aircraft’s ability to refuel in flight using the probe-and-drogue approach favoured by the Royal Navy, Royal Air Force, U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps.
Whilst at Patuxent River the F-35B will also replicate operations aboard “ski jump” aircraft carriers, such as those operated by the Royal Navy using a specially designed ramp.
In March 2009, the U.K. Ministry of Defence announced its intention to order three instrumented STOVL F-35 Lightning II test aircraft and associated support equipment for Operational Test and Evaluation purposes.
BAE Systems is the premier global defence, security and aerospace company delivering a full range of products and services for air, land and naval forces, as well as advanced electronics, security, information technology solutions and customer support services. With approximately 105,000 employees worldwide, BAE Systems' sales exceeded £18.5 billion (US $34.4 billion) in 2008.