Armée Israélienne (IDF)

Intéressant merci pour la doc

Donc une portée effective de 70 km, pensez vous qu'il serait utile face à des smerch ?

certainement c'est d'ailleur la raison d'etre de ces systémes car le hezbollah et la syrie possede des roquettes et des missiles de méme calibre et superieur au smerch ,je ne voit pas israel developpé ces systémes pour des grad ou des kassam.

Il serait alors parfait pour les FAR, idéal pour contrer les smerch de l'ANP

Fahed64 a écrit:

Il serait alors parfait pour les FAR, idéal pour contrer les smerch de l'ANP

oui,mais bon il serai dommage que le entre en guerre avec l'algerie ,de plus le polisario est plus faible que jamais est subit une crise interne.

GlaivedeSion a écrit:

Fahed64 a écrit:

Il serait alors parfait pour les FAR, idéal pour contrer les smerch de l'ANP

oui,mais bon il serai dommage que le entre en guerre avec l'algerie ,de plus le polisario est plus faible que jamais est subit une crise interne.

SI VIX PACEM PARA BELLUM

C'est que Israël fait H 24, à méditer

GlaivedeSion a écrit:

Fahed64 a écrit:

Il serait alors parfait pour les FAR, idéal pour contrer les smerch de l'ANP

oui,mais bon il serai dommage que le entre en guerre avec l'algerie ,de plus le polisario est plus faible que jamais est subit une crise interne.

Prépare la guerre pour avoir la paix

Fahed64 a écrit:

GlaivedeSion a écrit:

Fahed64 a écrit:

Il serait alors parfait pour les FAR, idéal pour contrer les smerch de l'ANP

oui,mais bon il serai dommage que le entre en guerre avec l'algerie ,de plus le polisario est plus faible que jamais est subit une crise interne.

SI VIX PACEM PARA BELLUM

C'est que Israël fait H 24, à méditer

du cout tu as une adresse pour la livraison? tu veux combien d'iron dome?

de toute facon toi et moi savons trés bien qu'israel fournira en arme le maroc en cas de guerre contre l'algerie ou le polisario .

israel forme actuellement un bataillon de dca destiné a mettre en oeuvre ces systémes debut 2010. ce qui soulagera les frontiéres nord et sud du pays et donnera une liberté d'action plus large a l'armée ,certains rapport de l'aman sur le hezbollah font état de roquette avec des tétes chimiques

Je ne fais pas parti de l'EM

Israël a déja conseillé le Maroc durant la guerre au sahara, chose normale entre cousin

Fahed64 a écrit:

Je ne fais pas parti de l'EM

Israël a déja conseillé le Maroc durant la guerre au sahara, chose normale entre cousin

pas que pour la guerre ,l'agriculture aussi.

bon a demain l'ami j'ai un article sur l'aster 30 qui m'attend.

voici des photos et des videos de ugv israelien

Iai/Rafael Guardium

video :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLKbInFVTRo

Elbit viper non armé


armé



videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6rWfq6pX34&feature=PlayList&p=21B049114D291603&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=22

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST4-i-z0rWs

robot demineur noté le fusil a pompe ou cas ou.

eye drive


video :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfK8ofkqIpQ

Citation :

IDF F-16s fly at Red Flag

July 20, 2009 (by 2nd Lt. Emily Chilson) - Flying at home station is necessary for training, but flying with other units, especially an allied unit like the Israeli Air Force, results in valuable experience and preparation for the fight.


Red Flag exercises present a unique experience for U.S. and allied units to fly together against red air, or 'enemy' aircraft provided by the Aggressor Squadrons at Nellis Air Force Base, in a realistic combat environment.

The Israeli Air Force's "Bats" squadron is made up of the F-16-I Storm, a multi-role, two-seater fighter jet capable of low flying, strike and offensive counter air.

Captain Gilad, a 25-year-old IAF pilot and Tel Aviv, Israel, native, experienced Red Flag for the first time this week.

"So far Red Flag has answered my expectations," he said. "It's very interesting. We can learn a lot from each other. We're learning new tactics and flight techniques, but there are a lot of similarities too."

Red Flag is an optimal venue for pilots from U.S. and allied units around the world to work together in a combat environment. The IAF pilots bring new procedures or methods for U.S. pilots, while the IAF pilots also learn from their U.S. counterparts.

"The reason anyone comes to Red Flag is to learn how to fight together," said Maj. Kate Lowe, Red Flag Air Boss. "So Just like U.S. forces from different squadrons or sister services come together to participate, we bring in allied forces to get to know both their fighting capabilities as well as the people themselves."

Israeli Air Force pilots speak to one another in Hebrew, and while language has the potential to be an obstacle, it's practically a non-issue at Red Flag.

"Language barriers are always a challenge, but their English is way better than my Hebrew," Major Lowe said.

It's not so much the language itself, as it is the technical terminology used in mission planning and briefings in the Red Flag building.

"Most of us know pretty good English," Captain Gilad said, referring to his comrades. "But it's the different acronyms, and aviation talk that is sometimes challenging."

When it comes to skill, Captain Gilad and his fellow IAF pilots came prepared for any challenge Red Flag 09-4 threw at them. The only thing new, he said, is the terrain, the base and training rules - which are a bit different from those in the IAF, but not too much.

For example, IAF F-16I pilots are allowed to coast at 100 feet off the ground, while U.S. F-16s have to stay at 500 feet unless they're strafing, a term related to ground attack.

"We learn a lot from U.S. pilots, like daily routines and how to give organized briefings, but flying here is one of the main goals that we want to experience," he said. "Flying in unknown terrain - it's very different than flying in our homeland where we know every rock and every corner."

Coming from a country that's only about 300 miles in length by 30 miles in width, Captain Gilad isn't kidding when he says he knows every rock and corner. And while the terrain presents the IAF with new challenges, the heat of Las Vegas, he said, isn't so much of a problem.

Another plus Red Flag offers U.S. and Israeli pilots alike, is the scale of the flying missions. Unlike home station flying, Red Flag missions encompass many different types of aircraft flying Large Force Employments, or LFEs.

"We do a lot more basics training in Israel," Captain Gilad said. "Flying here is more mission-oriented."

When he's in Israel, Captain Gilad serves in two squadrons. One squadron is operational, where pilots are on alert, and ready to respond to emergencies or threats. In the other squadron, he's an instructor pilot, teaching other pilots about combat - especially dogfights. Although his military commitment is up, Captain Gilad chooses to remain in the IAF.

"In Israel everyone has to be in the military," he said. "By testing, they choose if you go in the army, navy or air force."

Captain Gilad attended the Israeli Flight Academy for three years, but it took two additional years of training before he became operational, or ready to fight. Although the IAF is not involved in a fight right now, earlier this year, he fought in the Gaza Strip conflict.

"We have to be very cautious because it's so close to home," he said. "We attack very strategically. But right now it's mainly homeland defense and protecting our citizens."

Like the U.S., Israel recognizes the diplomatic and strategic need to maintain allied relationships.

"We have a great relationship with the U.S. Air Force," Capt Gilad said. "A relationship we want to keep and make better."

And the Air Force recognizes that America's strategic partnerships are more important than ever. Red Flag is vital in fostering and maintaining those relationships, capitalizing on the global community of like-minded Airmen while enhancing interoperability between allies and partners like Israel.

"It's not only the mentality and the way the U.S. and Israeli air forces approach planning and executing tactics, but also our systems," Major Lowe said. "Are our radios compatible? Are our weapons compatible? Can we hear each other? Better to know it now than when the bombs are dropping."

This may be Captain Gilad's first Red Flag, but it won't necessarily be his last. The IAF, according to Captain Gilad, tries to send pilots of all ages and experience levels to Red Flag.

"We could find ourselves here again," he said. "We always send someone who's been here before for better guidance. Coming to Red Flag is a big privilege, and everybody wants to come because it's very good experience for us."

Courtesy of Red Flag Public Affairs

http://www.f-16.net/news_article3637.html


IDFAF F-16D block 52 #421 from 253 Sqn is seen flying alongside block 52 #425 from 119 Sqn head out to the Nevada Test and Training Range during a training mission at Red Flag 09-4, Nellis AFB on July 16, 2009.A squadron of F-16Is from Ramon Air Base, Israel, is one of the nine units participating in Red Flag 09-4 through July 24 in Las Vegas.



An IDFAF F-16D block 52 from Ramon AB, Israel, moves into refueling position on July 16, 2009 over the Nevada Test and Training Range during Red Flag 09-4.

Glaive est ce que les contrats de ventes d'armes sont notifié au parlement où elles sont pas déclarée?
apparemment nous avions acheté des blindés de chez vous
https://far-maroc.forumpro.fr/contrats-d-achats-et-autres-f20/achats-d-armes-des-far-t629-375.htm

ca date des 80s ca..

des ram tu dit? interessant voila un ram 2000 en service au chad (la visiblement eprouve par les combats)



les ventes d'armement sont sensible en israel,elles ne sont pas declarés specialement quand il s'agit de pays arabes .

L'essai du missile d'interception Arrow 3 israélien a échoué. Grosse décéption à Tel Aviv

Citation :

ANALYSIS / Iran can rejoice as Israel fails missile defense test

Despite attempts by the operators of the Arrow missile defense system in Israel to portray Wednesday night's aborted test as "a partial success," in reality it was nothing less than a resounding failure. The fact that the interceptor missile failed to launch in the direction of the target is damning proof that the test failed.

Overall, the goal of the test is not to assess various data systems that could be checked without launching the missile, but to launch the interceptor missile at the oncoming target. In this case, the target was a simulator missile of the Iranian Shihab, whose range exceeds 1,000 kilometers, more than enough to reach Israel.


The Defense Ministry's well-oiled public relations machine has for years propagated the notion that the Arrow system is the best in the world, and that it is capable of answering long-range missile threats against Israel.

Yet, in practice, it turns out that the threats are growing more ominous, and, in this game of cat and mouse, a defense system has no chance to get up to speed with missiles whose range and efficacy are increasing at a fast pace.

Originally, the Arrow was designed to intercept Scud missiles with a range of 300-400 kilometers. After it became clear that the Iranians - with aid from North Korea and China - are increasing the range of missiles, Israel was forced to regroup and cope with the new reality. As a result, it developed the Arrow 2 system.

Now, when Iran holds in its arsenal the Shihab 3 missile which can reach any target in Israel, a new solution must be found. This was in essence the goal of the unsuccessful test in California. In addition, Iran is about to incorporate a missile with a range of 2,000 kilometers into its arsenal. Not coincidentally, even though there has been little media attention on the subject, Israel is mulling the purchase of the U.S.-made THAAD missile defense, which is still in the development phase.

The U.S. Missile Defense Agency said that the test involved a dummy missile that was fired from a C-17 aircraft, which was detected by the Arrow's radar. The data was then transferred to the "battle management control center" on the ground. Yet, due to the fact that "not all test conditions to launch the Arrow Interceptor were met," it was decided to abort.

This mishap will be thoroughly examined in Iran. There is no doubt that Tehran's director of its missile program will be rubbing his hands with satisfaction. Beyond the technical glitch, this failure is also a psychological blow for Israel and the U.S, its partner in the project.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1102347.html

peut qu'il qu'ils vont opter pour une solution provisoire comme s'équiper de THAAD, ça leur permettra de se mettre à l'abri ''d'une attaque qui n'aura jamais lieu'' et avoir suffisament de temps pour parfaire leur système Arrow 3.

Arrow 2 est deja capable de protége israel,d'apres les nouvelles qui court en israel ce sont les americains qui ont annulé le lancement de l'intercepteur ,les israéliens etais pret a faire feu.attendons quelques jours pour y voir plus clair,d'autant plus que les israéliens sont toujours sur place pour eventuellement faire d'autres essais.

pendat ce temps la en israel,un autre exercice impliquant le radar AN/TPY2 posté dans le desert du negev et le systéme d'alerte precosse israélien a eu lieu .

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1248277877473&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

GlaivedeSion a écrit:

Arrow 2 est deja capable de protége israel,d'apres les nouvelles qui court en israel ce sont les americains qui ont annulé le lancement de l'intercepteur ,les israéliens etais pret a faire feu.attendons quelques jours pour y voir plus clair,d'autant plus que les israéliens sont toujours sur place pour eventuellement faire d'autres essais.

J'ai entendu sur une chaîne TV que la presse israélienne en voulait aux Américains à ce sujet, mais je me demande à quel point ça peut être vrai Pour quelle raison les Américains voudront-ils empêcher l'essai
A moins que ce ne soit un message aux dirigeants d'Israël pour qu'ils ne s'avisent pas d'attaquer l'Iran
Affaire à suivre

Samyadams a écrit:

GlaivedeSion a écrit:

Arrow 2 est deja capable de protége israel,d'apres les nouvelles qui court en israel ce sont les americains qui ont annulé le lancement de l'intercepteur ,les israéliens etais pret a faire feu.attendons quelques jours pour y voir plus clair,d'autant plus que les israéliens sont toujours sur place pour eventuellement faire d'autres essais.

J'ai entendu sur une chaîne TV que la presse israélienne en voulait aux Américains à ce sujet, mais je me demande à quel point ça peut être vrai Pour quelle raison les Américains voudront-ils empêcher l'essai
A moins que ce ne soit un message aux dirigeants d'Israël pour qu'ils ne s'avisent pas d'attaquer l'Iran
Affaire à suivre

je suis pas loin de penser la méme chose,au mois d'octobre,israel a des manoeuvres avec les usa, au programme arrow 2, patriot 3,thaad,aegis et sm3. et je sais pas pourquoi mais j'ai l'impression que le arrow 2 fonctionnera parfaitement mais en israel. mais bon laissons l'affaire ce refroidir ,mais suivons la.

quel sont l'etat des Patriot?

normalement ces dernié sont efficasse pour contré les eventuel SSM iranien.

ce sont des Pac3 +

PAC3+

Pas mal qd meme donc inutile de s'inquieté pour les arrow..

Justement,l'armée viens de reveler qu'elle a abbattue un drone avec un missile patriot 3 modifié en israel.ce qui ouvre de nouvelle possibilité car le drone ennemie pourra etre abbattue avant méme qu'il passe la frontiére avec israel.si j'ai plus de nouvelles je fais suivre.